![hebrew font for windows hebrew font for windows](https://blogfonts.com/fonts/s/453/150453/img/squid-s2.jpg)
Nobody wants pipes to behave differently. Well, the logical order is not at play, nor should it be changed. How can a font "fix" or "break" the order of words (but not the order of letters within a word), and why would it be the font's responsibility to fix it? I echoed the label I wanted on top and cated the sample text file. Were the two screenshots produced by the same command (if so, what)? order of words) you meant to report here, could you please clarify? It's unclear to me which one of these two issues (different look of glyphs vs. See #538, and my work on a specification linked from there. Up until about half a year ago there wasn't even a remotely useful specification for the desired behavior. words are not written backwards) is extremely hard when it comes to BiDi in terminals. Making sure that each character cell contains the exact letter it needs to contain (i.e. I understand that Arabic and Farsi is very complicated. Having Hebrew glyphs supported in a modern terminal font would just make the experience work well out of the box. I'm wondering: Which one is the correct one? (But first: Are the letters of each word in the correct order?) Were the two screenshots produced by the same command (if so, what)? How can a font "fix" or "break" the order of words (but not the order of letters within a word), and why would it be the font's responsibility to fix it?
![hebrew font for windows hebrew font for windows](https://www.iclarified.com/images/news/50471/237502/237502.jpg)
The other is that the words are in reverse order in one of them. I find this variant more pleasing to my eyes and more similar to the English text, although I cannot read Hebrew, so it's only a personal preference. One is that on the right hand size, the letters are somewhat bolder. I can see two differences between the two screenshots. Even just copying the glyphs for Hebrew from Courier New or Liberation Mono and resizing them for Cascadia would be a major help. So just covering the Hebrew alphabet would only require 27 glyphs.Īnd even if they're super basic and ugly it would still be really useful, just not having the layout break and stuff. And even diacritics could be omitted and it'd still be super duper useful and cover 99%+ of use cases (Hebrew is almost never written with vocalization). Hebrew doesn't have ligatures or any complex font behavior, at least for letters. Proposed technical implementation details (optional) Very, very few Monospace fonts actually work with Hebrew, and using font fallback isn't a good solution (look at what it does). In general, in terminal contexts, using Hebrew is a total nightmare. Basically, include Hebrew glyphs in Cascadia.